Written by
Mike Ballard
Published on
February 15, 2018
Categories
Finance
Strategy
Management
Earlier this month, I was in New York City at the IMN Middle Market Multifamily Conference moderating a panel discussion for property owners who are considering creating their own management firms. As a partner in one of the industry’s larger outsourced accounting firms, I help clients make that decision every day. The discussion included some interesting questions I want to share with you as you make your own considerations on whether to create a management firm.
Q: What are the key issues to consider when creating your own management firm?
A: There are several things to consider, including:
Q: What is it that a management firm does for their fee?
A: A competent property manager can add significant value to your investment, which is why many experienced real estate investors will tell you that a good management company is worth its weight in gold. There are four primary things that the management firm does for an owner.
This is an ideal scenario. These results can only be expected if a management company is competent, trustworthy and a good fit for your portfolio. A poor choice of a management company can produce many headaches of its own, which happens more frequently than one would expect.
If you have a good working relationship with your management company and the property is performing well, it may not be wise to upset the apple cart, so to speak.
Q: What are the costs associated with third-party management vs. creating my own management firm? Is there a financial benefit to having my own firm?
A: That’s one of the most important questions, and one that can be best illustrated in a direct comparison. Below are two case studies of owners, one with eight properties and 2,000 units and another with ten properties and 400 units in a high-rent market like New York.
The one thing I see is that most of our clients don’t change solely for financial reasons. Most make the change because something else wasn’t right. They are frustrated that reports aren’t right or on time or there is some other indication that the interests of the management firm weren’t aligned with the owner’s goals.
Q: What is the most important consideration?
A: According to panelist Steve Firestone, managing partner of Crown Bay commercial real estate, ‘The key is to hire the right person to run the ‘in-house’ management firm.” I couldn’t agree more. In our experience, you MUST hire a regional manager, assuming your properties are located in the same general area. The key is to find the right person and allow them to make it succeed. If you don’t hire a regional manager, you will not be successful managing your own properties.
We had a client with numerous properties and several thousand units in the mid-west that took their management in-house. They chose to assign one of their partners to connect with each property manager. He had an MBA with a real estate focus, but little property management experience. Their properties were spread out in five or six states in all three time zones. They hired an accounting staff of three people. They experienced turnover in the accounting staff, didn’t visit the properties as often as they had planned, etc. The properties didn’t perform nearly as well as with professional management. After 15 months and a lot of pain, they threw in the towel and hired three management firms to take over the management.
Q: What are other issues I should consider before bringing the management in house?
A: One thing to keep in mind is that creating your own management firm may not be right for you. This could include factors like:
Q: Is there increased liability?
A: Not really, because you, the owner, were already on the hook. Most management companies require the owner to indemnify them against most issues.
If you have been considering creating your own management firm, give me a call for a free consultation. It’s one of my favorite things to discuss.